Why Yamibuchi?
With ceasing thinking I was about to lynch ▼Montague, but if he is false, why didn't wolves choose no attack?

Oh, I see.
▼Montague

>>1　is about the attack, not fortune-telling

And I wonder why Yamibuchi in fortune-telling,too...

>>7
So Sorry but I cannot understand you because I'm not Seer.
In my sight, if Montague is truth,LW is Michael.
It's easier than your sight.
I’ll consider.
Anyway, we must wait for Psychics.

>>8
Don't you think so?
If you （or me） are wolf, who did you attack?

Yes,I keep.

I wonder why True-Montague doesn't doubt me before suspects impostors of twin wolves.
Am I so white in your（Montague） sight.

I wanna think deeper so I won't commit at present.
Hope also Angelot's voice.

Oh, Montague　has no throat?
It's terrible...

Michael is more persuasive for the conclusion than montague,I think.
In other words, Montague doesn't seem considering me much but　he concluded that Celeste is not a wolf.

aha,please refrain from excessive expression as >>38

I feel shocked a bit.

The factor Montague is fake I thought is the emotion in >>7>>13.
In spite of the existence as Angelot（Montague's absolute fellow）, Why did he look so lonely?
I felt too tragic to believe him.

And the line with Next is consistent in "cutting style".

Wolves’ attacking trace, composition of line as cutting style and Montague's CO timing wholly are ”going against the theory".
I can see clearly wolves' strategy.So I vote Montague.

If not,,,, So Sorry!!goodnight