Ohh... well...
What the heck should we do?

Anyway, we still shouldn't any CO or non-CO.

>>21 Michael
I'm so confusing, too.
I've just thought it's likely that Corn isn't a human and did the CO to make the true Seer show up.

So we could go on without doing COs, and consider Corn later.
But now I found the Harriot's CO, so it's no use.
I'm 【neither the Seer nor the Psychis.】

>>26 Michael
If Corn is true, we can anyway get the Seer results only once, right?
So it was better way to carry on supposing there is a true seer other than Corn.

Oh my goodness. My state points is melting away...
I refrain from stating for a while.

Though I said like >>7, now I want to select a person who seems a wolf today.

>>27 Corn
Don't worry, my friend.
Your action may be a clue about finding wolves.
☆Yeah, not doing COs on the first day needn't be the best way.
I wanted to know widely opinions of you guys in the first place.

>>30 Michael
I now got it. The CO like Harriot is a good one.
★Did you think you would encourage us to do this sort of CO?
You suggested we should complete COs / non-COs in >>21, though.

>>55 Celeste
★What do you think about my question to Michael(>>36)?
Even after reading his reply (>>37), I remain unconvinced a little yet.
Without this, I could believe in him.

>>73 Montague
Are you sure?
The Psychic is one who can know whether lynched men are wolves or not.
You made such a mistake that it's okay to say you must be a human.

>>76 Montague
I understand it's a linguistic problem.
I'll take back my >>74.
Thanks.

>>64 Michael Never mind.

>> Nemo
You really don't have to reply to Corn today.
If we can't correctly select a wolf for Seer's skill, we'll have a hard time.
You had better search for wolves among us.

【●Nemo○MILES】
I feel it's possible that Nemo is one of the wolves.
As they say, no rose is without a thorn!
Kidding aside, she hasn't turn to non-COers at all.
On top of that, the reaction >>78 looks verbose.
It may be that the defensive attitude came from her being a wolf.

I think MILES hasn turn to non-COers second least.
I'll detail it tomorrow.
I'll agree with everything @0